كما يتهم الادعاء العام موكلنا بمخال

كما يتهم الادعاء العام موكلنا بمخالفة المادة (7) والمادة (20) من قانون حماية المستهلك ، اما عن المادة (7) فهي تختص بتداول السلع ، والسلع تم تعريفها بانها كل منتج صناعي او زراعي او حيواني او تحويلي , ولا تعتبر الاكياس واحدة من هذه الاشياء التي تم تعريفها في القانون نفسه ، اما المادة (20) تتحدث عن ترويج السلع والاعلان والدعاية عنها وكما هو مذكور في تحليل الوقائع وملف الدعوى ان المتهم السابع وباقي المتهمين كافة لم يمارسوا اي نوع من انواع العرض او الترويج او البيع او الدعاية او الاعلان للسلعة المضبوطة محل الاتهام .

النتائج (الإنجليزية) 2:

Prosecution of our client is also accused of violating Article (7) and Article 20 of the Consumer Protection Act, either Article (7) are concerned with the circulation of goods, and the goods are defined as all industrial products, agricultural or animal or transformative, and the bags are considered to be one of these things that are defined in the law itself, either Article 20 speaks of merchandising, advertising and publicity for and as mentioned in the analysis of the facts and file the lawsuit that accused the seventh and the rest of the defendants all did not exercise any kind of presentation or promotion, sale or publicity or advertising of the product the exact place of the charge.

النتائج (الإنجليزية) 3:

He accused the prosecution Mwklna breach of article (7) and (20) of the consumer protection law, the article (7) which specializes in handling goods, commodities are defined as each product manufacturing or agricultural, animal, or transformational, and bags is one of those things that have been defined in the act. (20) itself, the article talks about commodity promotion, advertising and publicity about her and as noted in the analysis of the facts, and the case seventh and the other defendants accused of all never exercise Oh, any kind of offer, sale, promotion or publicity or advertisement of a commodity being charged.