COLLAPSEIn “what the Nobel peace pr

COLLAPSE
In “what the Nobel peace prize truly values “, Falk (2016) stats that the how dose someone won the Nobel peace prize while he did not deserve it. The Author is not happy because of the Nobel peace prize (2016) selection for the Columbian president while he failed in a peace deal ,then he gives another examples for failed selection such as Barak Obama in 2009 while he has done nothing except the ageist word for peace. In fact the Author was successful in working his points, the Author gives enough and strong examples, and the article was one side opinion. While the strongest two ideas were how the prize this year goes to some one who tries and fails to make a Pease deal, and how the prize goes to president Obama while he just completes one year in his presidency.

How the Nobel peace prize goes this year to someone who failed making peace the author disagrees with the fact that nowadays the prize is giving just for trying as what Thorbjorn Jegland say’s, Falk was having a great point here as an example if any team in the champions lege tries to win they deserve to get the trophy while the fact is that no one gets it expect who tries then success.

The second point the author was strong in is that how the prize is given too early to Barak Obama while he completed just one year in his presidency while we saw that after the prize he success in making a war The author failed to include that this prize goes to Barack Obama just because he is the president of the United States of America.

The author successfully presents his opinion by giving examples like the president of Colombia and the president of the united stat and he shows some facts which make his article strong.

النتائج (الإنجليزية) 2:

COLLAPSE with
In "what the by peace , the Nobel prize truly values", Falk (2016) That the stats how someone is on a dose won the prize , the Nobel by peace The while he didnt not Deserve it. The Author is not happy because of the Nobel peace prize (2016) selection for the Columbian president while he failed in a peace deal, then he gives another examples for failed selection such as Barak Obama in 2009 while he has done nothing except the ageist word for peace. In fact the Author was successful in working his points, the Author gives enough and strong examples, and the article was one side opinion. The while the strongest two ideas were how the prize this year goes to some one 's WHO COMPLETE tries and fails to make a Pease Ask Question, and how the prize goes to president Obama The while he by just completes one 's year in his Presidency.

How the , the Nobel by peace prize goes this year to someone who failed making peace the author disagrees with the fact that nowadays the prize is giving just for trying as what Thorbjorn Jegland say's, Falk was having a great point here as an example if any team in the champions lege tries to win they deserve to get the TROPHY The while the fact is That no one 's gets it expect WHO COMPLETE tries then success.

The second point the author was strong in is That how the prize is given too early to Barak Obama The while he completed by just one 's year in his Presidency The while we 've by saw That after the prize he success in making a war The author failed to include That this prize goes to Barack Obama by just Because he is the president of the United States of America.

The author successfully presents his opinion by vBulletin® .giving examples like the president of Colombia and the president of the united stat and he shows some facts which make his article strong.