ردت المطعون ضدها ومفاد ردها أن الذي

ردت المطعون ضدها ومفاد ردها أن الذي أثار الطاعن في السبب هو جدل في سلطة محكمة الموضوع وهو ما لا يجوز إثارته أمام المحكمة العليا حيث إن الطاعنه لم تف بالتزامها وما تقوله الطاعنة أن خلو المبنى من إضافات ولمسات لا تجعله غير قابل للانتفاع فهو جدل موضوعي لا يجوز إثارته بالجملة وأن جميع أوجه الطعن لا أساس لها من الصحة إذ الحكم جاء صحيحا وختم رده برفض الطعن و إلزام رافعه بالمصاريف والرسوم وأتعاب المحاماة .

النتائج (الإنجليزية) 1:

Contested against replied to the effect that the appellant raised in why is the trial court Authority controversy which could not be raised before the Supreme Court so that contesting has not fulfilled its commitment and what you say is contesting that inexpressive building of extras and touches don't make it unusable for use it is a substantive argument may not be raised and that all aspects of the appeal unfounded as the verdict came true seal and to dismiss the appeal and obliging crane charges and fees and Attorney's fees.

النتائج (الإنجليزية) 2:

They contested against it replied to the effect a response that has raised contestant reason is controversial in the authority of the trial court, which may not be raised before the Supreme Court as the contesting not fulfilled its commitment to what you're saying contesting the vacant building of extras touches not inoperable, utilization is an objective debate may not be Wholesale raised and that all aspects of the appeal is not unfounded as the referee came true and seal his response to reject the appeal and oblige crane expenses and fees and attorney's fees.