وضوح وثبوت ان طلب شراء الاكياس من ا

وضوح وثبوت ان طلب شراء الاكياس من المتهم السابع لانها لازمه للاستخدام الخاص بالشركة واشتراط المتهم ان استعمالها مقصور على ذلك كشرط للبيع .
قيام المتهم السابع بتوريد قيمة هذه الاكياس الى الشركة التي يعمل بها ولم يأخذها لنفسه او يستفيد منها .
بعد المتهم السابع عن الوقائع واحداث مسرح الواقعة محل الاتهام وعدم علمه حتى بمكانها.
توقف انتاج الصنف من الارز (اهلا) ومعرفة المتهم السابع ويقينه انه لا يمكن ان يتم ترويجها في السوق من قبل باقي المتهمين .
انعدام اي اتفاق او ثبوت تفاهم بين المتهم السابع وباقي المتهمين على بيع او ترويج الارز موضوع الاتهام .
تاريخ الرسائل المتبادلة لشراء الاكياس تسبق تاريخ الضبط والتنفيش .
عليه وحيث ان المتهم السابع لم يتفق مع اي شخص ولم يثبت علمه بأي فعل من الافعال المنسوبة لباقي المتهمين فلا يمكن الزج به في تهمه مشتركة او اعتباره متدخلا فرعيا في اي جريمة .

النتائج (الإنجليزية) 1:

Clear and confirmed that the purchase order from the seventh suspect bags as necessary for your company's use and a requirement that the accused be used exclusively as a condition of sale.A seventh accused of supplying these bags value to the company and did not take her for himself or benefit.After the seventh suspect about facts and events scene replaces the accusation and lack of knowledge was even in place.Production of rice (hi) and know the defendant VII and his certainty that he could not be promoted in the market before the rest of the accused.The lack of any agreement or understanding between the seventh and the accused prove the rest of the defendants on the sale or promotion of rice subject.History of communications to purchase the exact date precede bags waltnvish.Him as the seventh suspect didn't get along with anyone and didn't prove his knowledge in any of the acts attributed to the rest of the defendants cannot be baptized in joint charge or as involved in any crime.

النتائج (الإنجليزية) 2:

Clarity and prove that buying bags of the seventh defendant asked to be necessary for the private use of the company of the accused that the requirement to use is limited to that as a condition of sale.
The seventh defendant to supply the value of these bags to the company in which it operates and did not take them for himself or take advantage of them.
After the seventh defendant on the facts and events Theater incident subject indictment and had no knowledge of even its place.
stopped production of the class of rice (Welcome) and know the seventh defendant and his belief that he can not be promoted in the market by the rest of the defendants. the
lack of any agreement or evidence of understanding between the seventh defendant and the rest of the defendants to sell or rice promote the subject charge.
date of messages exchanged to buy bags precede the seizure and Altnvic history.
him and that 's where the seventh defendant did not agree with anyone who did not prove he knew any of the acts attributed to the rest of the defendants can not be thrown in joint charge or considered as an accessory sub in any crime.