أحكام تمديد مدة الإجارة لحالة الضرو

أحكام تمديد مدة الإجارة لحالة الضرورة الملحة الضرورة الملحة وفقاً للقانون المدني الأردنيإعداد الطالبة: لبنى اسامة علي قعدانإشراف: الاستاذ الدكتور أنيس منصور المنصور الملخص من أهم المبادئ القانونية للعقد أن " العقد شريعة المتعاقدين"، فالأصل انتهاء الرابطة العقدية بانتهاء مدتها ولكن في حالة وجود ضرورة ملحّة فإنها تستلزم مخالفة ما اتفق عليه بين المتعاقدين في عقد الإيجار، وقد جاءت المادة (674) مدني استثناءً لما سبق ومنحت المستأجر حق المطالبة بتمديد مدة الإجارة، فالضرورة الملحة كما جاءت بالمادة محل الدراسة هي رخصة تشريعية لتمديد مدة الإجارة على أن لا تتجاوز مدة التمديد مدة وجودها واستمرارها – فالضرورة تقدر بقدرها – فهي حق للمستأجر لاستيفاء المنفعة المرجوة من المأجور، وبالمقابل يلتزم المستأجر بدفع أجر المثل عن مدة التمديد . ولإقرار الحق بالتمديد و دفع أجر المثل فإن المشرع المدني الأردني منح قاضي الموضوع السلطة التقديرية التي من خلالها يقوم بتقدير وجود حالة الضرورة الملحة والحكم بأجر المثل، مع عدم التجاوز والالتزام بالحدود الممنوحة له مع توفر الضمانات القانونية اللازمة التي تعطي حكمه القوة الملزمة وترتيب الأثر القانوني الناتج عند تطبيق نص المادة (674) مدني، محققاً بذلك التوازن العقدي والعدالة بين المستأجر و المؤجر وفقاً لهذه السلطة الممنوحة للقاضي. فقد جاءت هذه الدراسة لتوضيح ما جاء بنص المادة محل الدراسة (674) من القانون المدني، موضحة ماهية التمديد لحالة الضرورة الملحة وطبيعتها القانونية، والتمييز بينها وبين الحالات التي قد تتشابه معها، والسلطة الممنوحة للقاضي في تقديرها والحكم بأجر المثل عنها ،مع بيان الآثار المترتبة على حكم التمديد، وحالات انقضائها عند مخالفة المستأجر لإحدى التزاماته .واستنادا لما تقدم فقد توصلت الدراسة إلى مجموعة من النتائج نذكر من المهم منها :إن المشرع الأردني وكذلك الفقه لم يتعرضا لبيان مفهوم الضرورة الملحة والأحكام الناظمة لها ، كما لم يبين المشرع حدود سلطة القاضي التقديرية المتعلقة بتمديد مدة الإجارة والقيود الواردة عليها؛| وبناء عليه أوصت الدراسة المشرع التعرض بالبيان لأحكام الضرورة الملحة والقيود الواردة على قاضي الموضوع عند إعمال سلطته التقديرية في تمديد مدة الإجارة.

النتائج (الإنجليزية) 1:

Provisions to extend the lease period of the state of the urgency of the urgent necessity and in accordance with civil law Jordanian
student preparation: Lubna Osama Ali Ka'adan
supervision: Prof. Dr. Anis Mansour Al - Mansour

summary
of the most important legal principles of the contract that " the contract law of contract", the basic principle is the end of the contractual bond end of the period, but in the case of a they require urgent necessity in violation of what was agreed upon between the contractors in the lease, came article (674) , a civilian exception to the above and granted the right to claim the lessee to extend the lease period, the urgent Valdharorh also came under study article is a legislative license to extend the lease period on N extension period does not exceed a period of existence and continuity - Valdharorh should not be exaggerated - it is the right of the tenant to meet the desired wage benefit, and in return the tenant is obliged to pay the reward goes for the duration of the extension.
And recognition of the right extension and pay for the ideals, the civil legislator Jordanian grants judge discretionary power by which estimates the existence of a state of the urgent necessity and governance wage goes, with no overshoot and the limits granted to him with the necessary legal guarantees provide that give his binding force and arrangement of the legal effect of when you apply the text of Article (674) civilians, thus achieving lumpy balance and justice between the lessee and the lessor in accordance with the authority granted to the judge.
The study came to clarify what was the text of the article under study (674) of the Civil Code, explaining the nature of the extension of the state of urgency and legal nature, and the distinction between them and the situations that may resemble them, and the authority granted to the judge at the discretion and judgment paid goes by, with the statement of the implications on the rule of extension, cases of termination when the tenant breach of one of its obligations.
Based on the above, the study reached a set of results we mention the important ones: The Jordanian legislator, as well as Fiqh was not subjected to the statement of the concept of urgency and the provisions governing them, as the legislator did not indicate the limits of discretionary power of the judge regarding the extension of the lease period and restrictions contained them; | Accordingly, the study recommended the legislature exposure statement to the provisions of the urgent necessity and limitations contained on the subject judge at his discretion in the implementation of the extension of the lease period.

النتائج (الإنجليزية) 2:

Provisions for extending the lease period for the urgent necessity of necessity in accordance with Jordanian civil law
Preparing by: Lubna Osama Ali Qadan
Supervised by: Prof. Dr. Anis Mansour Mansour

Summary
One of the most important legal principles of the contract is that the contract is the law of the contractors, the original termination of the contract association by the end of its term, but in the case of an urgent necessity, it requires a violation of what was agreed between the contractors in the lease, and article (674) civil is an exception to the above and granted the tenant the right The urgent necessity, as stated in the article under consideration, is a legislative license to extend the duration of the lease, provided that the duration of the extension does not exceed the duration of its existence and continuity - the necessity is appreciated - it is the right of the tenant to meet the desired benefit of the wage, and in return the tenant is obliged to pay The same is paid for the duration of the extension.
In order to establish the right to extend and pay the proverbial wage, the Jordanian civil legislator granted the judge the discretion to assess the existence of the urgency and the ruling on the same wage, while not exceeding the limits granted to him with the necessary legal guarantees that give his judgment. Binding force and the order of the resulting legal effect when applying the text of article (674) is civil, thereby achieving the contractual balance and justice between the tenant and the lessor in accordance with this authority granted to the judge.
This study was made to clarify the text of the article in question (674) of the Civil Code, explaining what is the extension of the state of urgency and its legal nature, the distinction between them and the cases that may be similar to them, and the authority granted to the judge in its assessment and the ruling on the remuneration of the same, with the statement of the effects, The consequences of the extension provision, and the cases of expiration when the tenant violates one of his obligations.
Based on the foregoing, the study reached a set of conclusions, including the important one: the Jordanian legislator as well as the jurisprudence did not be exposed to the concept of urgency and the provisions governing it, nor did the legislator indicate the limits of the judge's discretion regarding the extension of the lease period and the restrictions contained in it; Accordingly, the study recommended that the legislator be subject to the statement of the provisions of the urgency and the restrictions imposed on the trial judge when fulfilling his discretion to extend the lease period.

النتائج (الإنجليزية) 3:

In case of emergency, the lease term shall be extended according to the urgent need of Jordanian civil law
Students prepare for Lubna Usama arikadan
Dr. anis Mansour
abstract
An important legal principle of contract is that contract law stipulates that the origin of contract is the termination of a long-term contract Association, but in an emergency, it needs to violate the agreement of both parties. Lease, which is a civil exception, the lessee has the right to ask for an extension of the lease term. For example, the article studied is an urgent need for a legislative license to extend the lease term Beyond its time of existence and duration - its ability needs to be assessed - it is a lessor's right to meet the required lessor's interests and the lessee undertakes to pay for the desired extension.
In order to realize the ideal expansion and the right to pay wages, Jordan's civil legislators have granted judges the discretion to assess the urgency and existence of ideal wage conditions without exceeding A provision that promises to give him the boundary, the necessary legal protection, the binding force and the legal effect, when a text is applied, including 674 civil cases, so as to achieve a decade of balance and justice The power conferred on a judge in accordance with these regulations between the lessee and the lessor.
The purpose of this study is to clarify the text of this paper, including civil law, to illustrate the expansion of its legal nature in the case of urgent need, and to distinguish between them and situations that may be similar, Give the judge a discretionary and remunerated decision, stating the effect of the extended judgment and the circumstances of terminating the judgment in case of breach of the lessee's obligations.
According to the research progress, a series of research results show that it is important that Jordanian legislators and jurisprudence do not express urgently needed concepts and regulations, for example, legislators do not have prescribed restrictions. The judge's discretion on the extension of lease term and restriction; therefore, the legislators suggest to study the necessity and urgency of disclosure, and the restraint of the judge in implementation; In the discretion to extend the lease term.