ثانيا : الدفوع الخاصة بالمتهم السا

ثانيا : الدفوع الخاصة بالمتهم السابع :
1- التدخل الفرعي حسب المادة (95) من قانون الجزاء :
تنص المادة (95) من قانون الجزاء على ان المتدخل الفرعي / كل من ساعد الفاعل على تهيئة الوسائل او اتمام ارتكاب الجريمة او شدد عزيمته او ارشده الى ارتكابها ، او كونه اتفق مع الفاعل قبل ارتكاب الجريمة او كان على علم بخطة الاشرار الجنائية .
ويتضح من هذا التعريف ان التدخل الفرعي لا ينشأ الا بتوافر العلم بالجريمة ووجودها سواء قبل او خلال او بعد ارتكابها والقول بغير ذلك يعتبر خطأ قانوني فادح لا يغتفر لانه متعلق بحرية المتهمين وحياتهم.
ومن التحقيقات والمستندات المقدمة من محامى جميع المتهمين نوضح الاتي لنفي علم وارادة المتهم السابع بوجود اي مخالفة او نية جريمة :

النتائج (الإنجليزية) 1:

Secondly: the defences for a seventh defendant:1. sub article intervention (95) of the Penal Code:Article (95) of the Penal Code that the intervenor sub/all who helped the actor to create or complete means commit crime or stressed his resolve or direct them to commit, or being a agree with the actor before committing the crime or was aware of the wicked plan.It is clear from this definition that the Sub intervention does not arise only through science and existence of crime either before or during or after the fact to argue otherwise fatal legal error is unforgivable because it is about freedom of the accused and their lives.And investigations and documents filed by the lawyer for all the defendants point out the following to the seventh science and denied the accused will of any offense or crime of intent:

النتائج (الإنجليزية) 2:

Second: own defenses seventh defendant:
1. Sub intervention by Article 95 of the Penal Code:
Article (95) of the Penal Code provides that the sub - intervenor / all of the actor helped to create the means or the completion of the commission of the crime or stressed his determination or to Arion commit, or as agreed with the offender before the crime was committed or was aware of a plan Criminal bad guys.
it is clear from this definition that the sub - intervention does not arise , but the availability of science to the crime and its presence , whether before, during or after the commission and to say otherwise is a legal blunder unforgivable because it is related freedom of the accused and their lives.
It is the investigation and the documents submitted by the lawyer for all the defendants to show follows deny science and the will of the seventh defendant existence of any wrongdoing or intention of the crime:

النتائج (الإنجليزية) 3:

The second case, the accused in seventh:1. The interference of sub article (95) of the Penal Code:Article 95 of the penal code provides that the accessory sub / every actor who helped to create the means or the completion of the crime or the will or Arshdh to commit, or being an actor before the offence was committed or was aware of the plan to the bad guys.It is clear from this definition that the interference subsystem arises only with knowledge of the crime occurrence, either before, during or after the fact to do otherwise is the fatal mistake of law do not forgive because he is accused and their freedom.From the investigations and documents submitted by all the accused"s lawyer pointed out that to deny the will of seventh suspect to be aware of any breach or faith.