ساعد الفاعل على تهيئة الوسائل او ات

ساعد الفاعل على تهيئة الوسائل او اتمام ارتكاب الجريمة ، او اشد عزيمته او ارشده الى ارتكابها
و حيث ان المتهم قد اعترف بانه باع الاكياس الجديدة الى الشركة التي يعمل بها المتهمين ، فانه بذلك يكون قد هيأ وسيلة ساعدت المتهمين في ارتكاب الجريمة ، فلولا قيام المتهم ببيعهم لهذه الاكياس لما تهيأ لهم القيام بالافعال التي كونت الجريمة وتمثلت احدى الافعال في استبدال اكياس ارز منتهي الصلاحية باكياس اخرى ،
ويتوافق ما اعترف به المتهم مع اقواله في الادعاء العام ولدي ادارة حماية المستهلك ، وكذلك مع محاضر الضبط التي بينت تحريز مجموعة من اكياس جديدة معبأة تحمل مسمى (الاهلي) وتأكد ذلك من خلال الصور الفوتوغرافية ومقاطع المرفقة في ملف الدعوى ،
وحيث ان المحكمة قد ثبت لها صحة ما اسند للمتهمين (الاول والثاني والثالث والخامس والسادس) من ارتكابهم لجنح مخالفة قانون حماية المستهلك ومخالفة قانون سلامة الغذاء ،
فان جنحة التدخل الفرعي فيما اسند اليهم ثابتة في حق المتهم السابع اخذا مما سبق بيانه ،
وعليه فالمحكمة تنتهي في قضائها الى ادانته ومعاقبته عنها حسبما يرد في منطوق الحكم ،
ولا ينفى ذلك ما دفع به المتهم من انه باع الاكياس الجديدة ليس بقصد البيع وانما كان للاستعمال الشخصي ،
فوفقا لاعترافه ان الاكياس متوقف التعبئة فيها منذ سنة ونصف ،
فضلا على ان وجود البيانات الجديدة في الاكياس وبتواريخ انتاج وانتهاء جديدين ،
فعلى افتراض انها للاستخدام الشخصي فلا يكون داع لطباعة بيانات جديدة عليها ، وهو ما ثبت وتم بيانه ، وعليه يكون هذا الدفع في غير محله جدير برفضه .

النتائج (الإنجليزية) 1:

ساعد الفاعل على تهيئة الوسائل او اتمام ارتكاب الجريمة ، او اشد عزيمته او ارشده الى ارتكابها و حيث ان المتهم قد اعترف بانه باع الاكياس الجديدة الى الشركة التي يعمل بها المتهمين ، فانه بذلك يكون قد هيأ وسيلة ساعدت المتهمين في ارتكاب الجريمة ، فلولا قيام المتهم ببيعهم لهذه الاكياس لما تهيأ لهم القيام بالافعال التي كونت الجريمة وتمثلت احدى الافعال في استبدال اكياس ارز منتهي الصلاحية باكياس اخرى ، ويتوافق ما اعترف به المتهم مع اقواله في الادعاء العام ولدي ادارة حماية المستهلك ، وكذلك مع محاضر الضبط التي بينت تحريز مجموعة من اكياس جديدة معبأة تحمل مسمى (الاهلي) وتأكد ذلك من خلال الصور الفوتوغرافية ومقاطع المرفقة في ملف الدعوى ، وحيث ان المحكمة قد ثبت لها صحة ما اسند للمتهمين (الاول والثاني والثالث والخامس والسادس) من ارتكابهم لجنح مخالفة قانون حماية المستهلك ومخالفة قانون سلامة الغذاء ، The misdemeanor interference with them gave sub static on the seventh defendant taking the foregoing statement, The Court thus ending its condemnation and punish them as reflected in the operative part of the judgment, And don't deny that what pushed the accused he sold new bags not with intent to sell, but was for personal use, According to his confession to fill stopped bags a year and a half ago, As well as on the existence of the new data in the bags and new production and expiration dates, So assuming it's for personal use it is not necessary to print the new data, which has been shown and explained, and it is this misplaced payment worthy of rejection.

النتائج (الإنجليزية) 2:

Actor helped to create the means or the completion of the commission of the crime, or the most determination or Arion to commit
and where the accused has confessed that he sold the new bags to the company that operates the defendants, it thus has created a way helped the accused in the commission of the crime, because without that the defendant sold them these bags are what prepares them to do deeds that made up the crime and represented one of the acts to replace the bags of rice expired bags again,
and complies acknowledged by the accused with his statements in the public prosecutor and I have a Department of consumer Protection, as well as with setting the minutes that showed Thariz a range of new bags packed carry the name of (Al Ahli) and confirmed by accompanying photographs in the case file and clips,
and where the court has proven its validity is assigned to the defendants ( the first, second, third, fifth and sixth) of committing a misdemeanor violation of the consumer Protection Act and violation of food safety law,
the misdemeanor sub - interference in assigned to them steady against the seventh defendant taking the above statement,
and the court ends in exercise of their jurisdiction to convicted and punished them as reflected in the verdict,
does not deny that what led him suspect he sold the new bags is not the purpose of sale, but it was for personal use,
according to his confession that the bags are turned off packing a year ago and a half,
as well as on the presence of new data in the bags and the dates of production and the end of the new,
assuming it for personal use is not a farewell to print new data on them, which proved to have been his statement, and it is this payment is misplaced worth rejecting.

النتائج (الإنجليزية) 3:

Helped the author to create the means or the completion of the crime, or Arshdh or a determination to commitAnd where the suspect had confessed that he had sold the bags to the new company with which the defendants and suspects in the crime, he thus created an helped these bags, were accused of selling them to enable them to do acts of crime, one of the acts to replace expired rice sacks filled with others,This was recognized by the official accused a public prosecution and the consumer protection department, as well as with the custody control records which revealed a set of new packed bags shoulder the name (EL) and make sure that through photographs and clips attached to the case file,As the court has proved to the correctness of the hands of the accused (the first fifth, third, second, sixth) having committed offences of violation of consumer protection law and the law of food safety. </s>Then a sub interference with assigned fixed at the right of the accused to them. Seventh they stated,Thus the court until she to the conviction and punishment as specified in the operative part of the judgment,It denies that what person, he sold the new bags is not for sale, but only for personal use,According to the confession that stopped packing bags for a year and a half,As well as that of the new data in Wbtwarykh bags of production and the newOn the assumption that it is for personal use there should be no need to print data, which is proved to have been his, this payment by the fit to reject.